Saturday, October 24, 2009

The "Hitler Myth"

The article by Kershaw was the most interesting thing to me this week. Especially interesting was Hitler's ability to create a broad base of support in Germany. The tenants of the Nazi Party appeared to have something for everyone, which was a far cry from the government during the Weimar Republic end even before. However, it should not be too surprising that Hitler was able to achieve this, although on a much larger scale than ever before, given the long history in Germany of the population to rally around or to deify one man, especially those acheived some kind of national honor usually surrounding some success. How quick the population can change once the successes stop coming though. Hitler was no different.

As Kershaw identifies, Hitler was able to provide a "positive pole in the Third Reich," while at the same time being able to separate from the less popluar aspects of Nazism that had more effect on the daily lives of the population. As we learned in class, it seems Hitler was able to do this through the Gleichshaltung. It appeared as if the asscociations below him were squabbling for the scraps and creating all the discontent and Hitler appeared as a man above it all. However, this is exactly how he wanted these groups to function. Very creative! However, while he was able to create the image of himself as the man of strength and stability perhaps....the most important thing was that Hitler continue to be successful particularly within the realm of foreign politics first. This he was able to accomplish and without blood shed as he gained back territories and ensured that if and when war came that Germany would not have to fight a two-front war. The manner in which he accomplished these successes led to a political disarmament of sorts within Germany. He was able to quiet political opponents given him and Goebbels time to amp up the propaganda machine and really penetrate deep into the heart of the population.

However, once a ways into the war and the losses began to mount he started to lose some popularity. The German population ceratinly is a fickled one. It is almost as if they will support any string leader who brings success and ignore other things they see going on. When the strength of the leader seems to wane even a bit, they jump off the bandwagon.

Hitler's propaganda certainly was interesting in its success to create a broad base of support, but ultimately longterm support from the German people seems to really some from success, success, and continued success.

3 comments:

  1. While it is certainly natural for a population to support a successful leader and to waiver behind an unsuccessful one, I think you raise an important point about the depth of the German's people's commitment to Hitler as well as to the crucial importance of his early successes. For a divided and defeated nation, plagued by political instability and economic downturn, a charismatic leader who not only promises great things but delivers on them (at least initially) without creating hardships for the populace will certainly attract followers and admirers. Hitler's early successes played a key role in helping to establish him as the man of mythic proportions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good point. The fact that Hitler did carry out some of his promises in the beginning must have catapulted the amount of trust the German people bestowed upon him. After WWI the German people were probably so downtrodden that Hitler's success stood out in such a way that he probably even had a little bit of slack regarding some early missteps or mistakes. If he stood out to the German people so much they probably loved him regardless of a few things that couldn't have been helped simply because if his earlier accomplishments.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The debateabilty of Hitler's worth as a leader is a timeless debate. He truly won the hearts of the German people by satisfying their most basic needs, mainly their employements and security. It is sad to see the loyalty to paid to Hitler as his regime proceeded to cuase unprecendented harm to Germany after 1942 when the war began to spiral downward. The myth surrounding this human is entirely relevant, and an important lesson to all democratic societies to be wary of the charismatic leader. Hitler has served history's as a model to represent the highest evil that can ensure under the realms of "democracy."

    ReplyDelete